72 lines
2.2 KiB
Markdown
72 lines
2.2 KiB
Markdown
# Quickstart: Frontend Style Unification
|
|
|
|
## Purpose
|
|
|
|
Validate that frontend style unification is implemented consistently across targeted routes without functional regressions.
|
|
|
|
## Preconditions
|
|
|
|
- Feature branch: `001-unify-frontend-style`
|
|
- Frontend dependencies installed
|
|
- Application starts successfully in local environment
|
|
- Target routes available: dashboards, tasks, reports, settings
|
|
|
|
## Validation Flow
|
|
|
|
### 1) User Story 1 — Consistent Visual Foundation (P1)
|
|
|
|
1. Open each target route: dashboards, tasks, reports, settings.
|
|
2. Compare visual primitives:
|
|
- typography hierarchy
|
|
- spacing rhythm
|
|
- card/container style
|
|
- button variant consistency
|
|
3. Confirm no route has conflicting visual language for shared primitives.
|
|
|
|
**Expected Result**: Shared visual baseline appears coherent across all targeted routes.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### 2) User Story 2 — Unified Navigation and Page Shells (P2)
|
|
|
|
1. Navigate through at least three top-level routes.
|
|
2. Verify shell consistency:
|
|
- page title placement
|
|
- context/breadcrumb area behavior
|
|
- primary/secondary action region location
|
|
- content container alignment
|
|
3. Confirm transitions do not break orientation cues.
|
|
|
|
**Expected Result**: Page shell pattern is consistent and predictable across routes.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### 3) User Story 3 — Predictable Feedback and States (P3)
|
|
|
|
1. Trigger loading state on at least two routes.
|
|
2. Trigger empty state and error state where possible.
|
|
3. Trigger one success feedback event (save/update/apply action).
|
|
4. Compare message tone, placement, and recovery actions.
|
|
|
|
**Expected Result**: Loading/empty/error/success feedback follows one canonical pattern.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Regression Safety Checks
|
|
|
|
1. Execute core functional flows on dashboards/tasks/reports/settings.
|
|
2. Confirm style unification did not remove or alter business-critical actions.
|
|
3. Confirm focus visibility and readability remain acceptable on updated UI areas.
|
|
|
|
**Expected Result**: No critical user flow regression and no accessibility degradation.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Conformance Checklist Snapshot
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Shared primitives aligned in targeted scope
|
|
- [ ] Page shell contract honored
|
|
- [ ] State feedback contract honored
|
|
- [ ] Terminology/tone consistency preserved
|
|
- [ ] i18n-compatible user-facing text
|
|
- [ ] No critical flow regressions |