# Implementation Plan: File Storage Management & UI **Branch**: `014-file-storage-ui` | **Date**: 2026-01-24 | **Spec**: [specs/014-file-storage-ui/spec.md](../014-file-storage-ui/spec.md) **Input**: Feature specification from `specs/014-file-storage-ui/spec.md` ## Summary This feature implements a managed file storage system for dashboard backups and exported repositories. It introduces a configurable storage root (defaulting to outside the workspace) and a Web UI to list, upload, download, and delete files. The system enforces a structured layout with `backups/` and `repositories/` subdirectories to keep artifacts organized. The UI supports hierarchical folder navigation (e.g., `backups/SS2/DashboardName`), allowing users to browse, download, and manage files within nested directories. ## Technical Context **Language/Version**: Python 3.9+ (Backend), Node.js 18+ (Frontend) **Primary Dependencies**: FastAPI (Backend), SvelteKit (Frontend) **Storage**: Local Filesystem (for artifacts), Config (for storage path) **Testing**: pytest (Backend), vitest/playwright (Frontend - implied) **Target Platform**: Linux server **Project Type**: Web application **Performance Goals**: File list load < 1s for 100 files, supports 50MB+ uploads **Constraints**: Must prevent path traversal, must not pollute git repo **Scale/Scope**: ~2-3 backend endpoints, 1-2 frontend pages/components ## Constitution Check *GATE: Must pass before Phase 0 research. Re-check after Phase 1 design.* - **I. Semantic Protocol Compliance**: - **Status**: PASSED - **Check**: Will use `[DEF]` anchors and `@RELATION` tags. - **Check**: Will follow File Structure Standard. - **II. Causal Validity (Contracts First)**: - **Status**: PASSED - **Check**: Contracts will be defined in `specs/014-file-storage-ui/contracts/` before implementation. - **III. Immutability of Architecture**: - **Status**: PASSED - **Check**: No changes to immutable architectural constraints expected. - **IV. Design by Contract (DbC)**: - **Status**: PASSED - **Check**: Functions will define `@PRE` and `@POST` conditions. - **V. Belief State Logging**: - **Status**: PASSED - **Check**: Will use standard logging patterns. - **VI. Fractal Complexity Limit**: - **Status**: PASSED - **Check**: Feature scope is small, unlikely to exceed complexity limits. - **VII. Everything is a Plugin**: - **Status**: PASSED - **Check**: New functionality will be implemented as a `StoragePlugin` (or similar) inheriting from `PluginBase`. ## Project Structure ### Documentation (this feature) ```text specs/014-file-storage-ui/ ├── plan.md # This file ├── research.md # Phase 0 output ├── data-model.md # Phase 1 output ├── quickstart.md # Phase 1 output ├── contracts/ # Phase 1 output └── tasks.md # Phase 2 output ``` ### Source Code (repository root) ```text backend/ ├── src/ │ ├── api/ │ │ └── routes/ │ │ └── storage.py # New route handler │ ├── plugins/ │ │ └── storage.py # New plugin implementation │ └── models/ │ └── storage.py # Pydantic models (StoredFile, StorageConfig) └── tests/ └── test_storage.py # Backend tests frontend/ ├── src/ │ ├── routes/ │ │ └── storage/ │ │ └── +page.svelte # Main storage UI │ ├── components/ │ │ └── storage/ │ │ ├── FileList.svelte # Component for listing files and folders (explorer view) │ │ ├── Breadcrumbs.svelte # Component for navigation │ │ └── FileUpload.svelte # Component for uploading │ └── services/ │ └── storageService.js # Frontend API client ``` **Structure Decision**: Standard Web Application structure (Backend + Frontend) with Plugin architecture for the backend logic. ## Complexity Tracking > **Fill ONLY if Constitution Check has violations that must be justified** | Violation | Why Needed | Simpler Alternative Rejected Because | |-----------|------------|-------------------------------------| | N/A | | |