busya/ss-tools
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests 1 Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

tasks ready

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
busya
2026-01-27 13:26:06 +03:00
parent d10c23e658
commit cc244c2d86
13 changed files with 813 additions and 1 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

26
specs/016-multi-user-auth/checklists/testing.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
# Testing Requirements Checklist: Multi-User Auth
**Purpose**: Validate test scenario coverage and strategy.
**Created**: 2026-01-27
**Feature**: [Link to spec.md](../spec.md)
## Functional Coverage
- [x] CHK001 Are positive test scenarios defined for Local Login? [Coverage, Spec §US-1] (Covered by T049)
- [x] CHK002 Are positive test scenarios defined for ADFS Login (mocked)? [Coverage, Spec §US-3] (Covered by T050)
- [x] CHK003 Are negative test scenarios defined for invalid passwords? [Coverage] (Covered by T049)
- [x] CHK004 Are negative test scenarios defined for unauthorized plugin access? [Coverage, Spec §US-2] (Covered by T049)
- [x] CHK005 Are test scenarios defined for switching between auth methods on the same screen? [Coverage] (Covered by T050)
## Edge Cases
- [x] CHK005 Are test scenarios defined for mixed-case username handling? [Edge Case] (Covered by T049)
- [x] CHK006 Are test scenarios defined for ADFS JIT provisioning with missing groups? [Edge Case] (Covered by T050)
- [x] CHK007 Are test scenarios defined for accessing the API with an expired token? [Edge Case] (Covered by T049)
- [x] CHK008 Are test scenarios defined for concurrent login sessions? [Edge Case] (Covered by T049)
## Integration & System
- [x] CHK009 Is the strategy defined for mocking ADFS during CI/CD tests? [Completeness] (Covered by T041)
- [x] CHK010 Are end-to-end tests required for the full admin user creation flow? [Coverage] (Covered by T050)
- [x] CHK011 Are tests required to verify the CLI admin creation tool? [Coverage] (Covered by T049)