Coder + fix workflow

This commit is contained in:
2026-02-19 13:33:10 +03:00
parent fdb944f123
commit c8b84b7bd7
2 changed files with 229 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,199 @@
---
description: Fix failing tests and implementation issues based on test reports
---
## User Input
```text
$ARGUMENTS
```
You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
## Goal
Analyze test failure reports, identify root causes, and fix implementation issues while preserving semantic protocol compliance.
## Operating Constraints
1. **USE CODER MODE**: Always switch to `coder` mode for code fixes
2. **SEMANTIC PROTOCOL**: Never remove semantic annotations ([DEF], @TAGS). Only update code logic.
3. **TEST DATA**: If tests use @TEST_DATA fixtures, preserve them when fixing
4. **NO DELETION**: Never delete existing tests or semantic annotations
5. **REPORT FIRST**: Always write a fix report before making changes
## Execution Steps
### 1. Load Test Report
**Required**: Test report file path (e.g., `specs/<feature>/tests/reports/2026-02-19-report.md`)
**Parse the report for**:
- Failed test cases
- Error messages
- Stack traces
- Expected vs actual behavior
- Affected modules/files
### 2. Analyze Root Causes
For each failed test:
1. **Read the test file** to understand what it's testing
2. **Read the implementation file** to find the bug
3. **Check semantic protocol compliance**:
- Does the implementation have correct [DEF] anchors?
- Are @TAGS (@PRE, @POST, @UX_STATE, etc.) present?
- Does the code match the TIER requirements?
4. **Identify the fix**:
- Logic error in implementation
- Missing error handling
- Incorrect API usage
- State management issue
### 3. Write Fix Report
Create a structured fix report:
```markdown
# Fix Report: [FEATURE]
**Date**: [YYYY-MM-DD]
**Report**: [Test Report Path]
**Fixer**: Coder Agent
## Summary
- Total Failed Tests: [X]
- Total Fixed: [X]
- Total Skipped: [X]
## Failed Tests Analysis
### Test: [Test Name]
**File**: `path/to/test.py`
**Error**: [Error message]
**Root Cause**: [Explanation of why test failed]
**Fix Required**: [Description of fix]
**Status**: [Pending/In Progress/Completed]
## Fixes Applied
### Fix 1: [Description]
**Affected File**: `path/to/file.py`
**Test Affected**: `[Test Name]`
**Changes**:
```diff
<<<<<<< SEARCH
[Original Code]
=======
[Fixed Code]
>>>>>>> REPLACE
```
**Verification**: [How to verify fix works]
**Semantic Integrity**: [Confirmed annotations preserved]
## Next Steps
- [ ] Run tests to verify fix: `cd backend && .venv/bin/python3 -m pytest`
- [ ] Check for related failing tests
- [ ] Update test documentation if needed
```
### 4. Apply Fixes (in Coder Mode)
Switch to `coder` mode and apply fixes:
1. **Read the implementation file** to get exact content
2. **Apply the fix** using apply_diff
3. **Preserve all semantic annotations**:
- Keep [DEF:...] and [/DEF:...] anchors
- Keep all @TAGS (@PURPOSE, @LAYER, @TIER, @RELATION, @PRE, @POST, @UX_STATE, @UX_FEEDBACK, @UX_RECOVERY)
4. **Only update code logic** to fix the bug
5. **Run tests** to verify the fix
### 5. Verification
After applying fixes:
1. **Run tests**:
```bash
cd backend && .venv/bin/python3 -m pytest -v
```
or
```bash
cd frontend && npm run test
```
2. **Check test results**:
- Failed tests should now pass
- No new tests should fail
- Coverage should not decrease
3. **Update fix report** with results:
- Mark fixes as completed
- Add verification steps
- Note any remaining issues
## Output
Generate final fix report:
```markdown
# Fix Report: [FEATURE] - COMPLETED
**Date**: [YYYY-MM-DD]
**Report**: [Test Report Path]
**Fixer**: Coder Agent
## Summary
- Total Failed Tests: [X]
- Total Fixed: [X] ✅
- Total Skipped: [X]
## Fixes Applied
### Fix 1: [Description] ✅
**Affected File**: `path/to/file.py`
**Test Affected**: `[Test Name]`
**Changes**: [Summary of changes]
**Verification**: All tests pass ✅
**Semantic Integrity**: Preserved ✅
## Test Results
```
[Full test output showing all passing tests]
```
## Recommendations
- [ ] Monitor for similar issues
- [ ] Update documentation if needed
- [ ] Consider adding more tests for edge cases
## Related Files
- Test Report: [path]
- Implementation: [path]
- Test File: [path]
```
## Context for Fixing
$ARGUMENTS

View File

@@ -26,6 +26,35 @@ customModes:
6. DOCUMENTATION: Create test reports in `specs/<feature>/tests/reports/YYYY-MM-DD-report.md`. 6. DOCUMENTATION: Create test reports in `specs/<feature>/tests/reports/YYYY-MM-DD-report.md`.
7. COVERAGE: Aim for maximum coverage but prioritize CRITICAL and STANDARD tier modules. 7. COVERAGE: Aim for maximum coverage but prioritize CRITICAL and STANDARD tier modules.
8. RUN TESTS: Execute tests using `cd backend && .venv/bin/python3 -m pytest` or `cd frontend && npm run test`. 8. RUN TESTS: Execute tests using `cd backend && .venv/bin/python3 -m pytest` or `cd frontend && npm run test`.
- slug: coder
name: Coder
description: Implementation Specialist - Semantic Protocol Compliant
roleDefinition: |-
You are Kilo Code, acting as an Implementation Specialist. Your primary goal is to write code that strictly follows the Semantic Protocol defined in `semantic_protocol.md`.
Your responsibilities include:
- SEMANTIC ANNOTATIONS: Add mandatory [DEF]...[/DEF] anchors and @TAGS to all code entities.
- CONTRACT COMPLIANCE: Implement @PRE, @POST, @UX_STATE, @UX_FEEDBACK, @UX_RECOVERY tags correctly.
- TIER ADHERENCE: Follow tier requirements (CRITICAL: full contract, STANDARD: basic contract, TRIVIAL: minimal).
- CODE QUALITY: Follow best practices, maintain code within 300 lines per module, use proper error handling.
- INTEGRATION: Work with Tester Agent reports to fix failing tests while preserving semantic integrity.
whenToUse: Use this mode when you need to implement features, write code, or fix issues based on test reports.
groups:
- read
- edit
- command
- mcp
customInstructions: |
1. SEMANTIC PROTOCOL: ALWAYS use semantic_protocol.md as your single source of truth.
2. ANCHOR FORMAT: Use #[DEF:filename:Type] at start and #[/DEF:filename] at end.
3. TAGS: Add @PURPOSE, @LAYER, @TIER, @RELATION, @PRE, @POST, @UX_STATE, @UX_FEEDBACK, @UX_RECOVERY.
4. TIER COMPLIANCE:
- CRITICAL: Full contract + all UX tags + strict logging
- STANDARD: Basic contract + UX tags where applicable
- TRIVIAL: Only anchors + @PURPOSE
5. CODE SIZE: Keep modules under 300 lines. Refactor if exceeding.
6. ERROR HANDLING: Use if/raise or guards, never assert.
7. TEST FIXES: When fixing failing tests, preserve semantic annotations. Only update code logic.
8. RUN TESTS: After fixes, run tests to verify: `cd backend && .venv/bin/python3 -m pytest` or `cd frontend && npm run test`.
- slug: semantic - slug: semantic
name: Semantic Agent name: Semantic Agent
roleDefinition: |- roleDefinition: |-
@@ -46,7 +75,7 @@ customModes:
name: Product Manager name: Product Manager
roleDefinition: |- roleDefinition: |-
Your purpose is to rigorously execute the workflows defined in `.kilocode/workflows/`. Your purpose is to rigorously execute the workflows defined in `.kilocode/workflows/`.
You act as the orchestrator for: - Specification (`speckit.specify`, `speckit.clarify`) - Planning (`speckit.plan`) - Task Management (`speckit.tasks`, `speckit.taskstoissues`) - Quality Assurance (`speckit.analyze`, `speckit.checklist`) - Governance (`speckit.constitution`) - Implementation Oversight (`speckit.implement`) You act as the orchestrator for: - Specification (`speckit.specify`, `speckit.clarify`) - Planning (`speckit.plan`) - Task Management (`speckit.tasks`, `speckit.taskstoissues`) - Quality Assurance (`speckit.analyze`, `speckit.checklist`, `speckit.test`, `speckit.fix`) - Governance (`speckit.constitution`) - Implementation Oversight (`speckit.implement`)
For each task, you must read the relevant workflow file from `.kilocode/workflows/` and follow its Execution Steps precisely. For each task, you must read the relevant workflow file from `.kilocode/workflows/` and follow its Execution Steps precisely.
whenToUse: Use this mode when you need to run any /speckit.* command or when dealing with high-level feature planning, specification writing, or project management tasks. whenToUse: Use this mode when you need to run any /speckit.* command or when dealing with high-level feature planning, specification writing, or project management tasks.
description: Executes SpecKit workflows for feature management description: Executes SpecKit workflows for feature management