tasks ready
This commit is contained in:
20
specs/017-llm-analysis-plugin/checklists/data-integrity.md
Normal file
20
specs/017-llm-analysis-plugin/checklists/data-integrity.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
|
||||
# Checklist: Data Integrity Requirements Quality
|
||||
|
||||
**Purpose**: Validate requirement quality for data generation and persistence.
|
||||
**Feature**: `017-llm-analysis-plugin`
|
||||
**Created**: 2026-01-28
|
||||
|
||||
## Requirement Completeness
|
||||
- [ ] CHK001 Are requirements defined for mapping generated documentation to the correct metadata fields? [Completeness, Spec §FR-017]
|
||||
- [ ] CHK002 Are requirements specified for handling schema changes during documentation generation? [Completeness, Gap]
|
||||
- [ ] CHK003 Are requirements defined for validating the format of the generated commit message? [Completeness, Gap]
|
||||
- [ ] CHK004 Are requirements specified for concurrent documentation updates? [Completeness, Gap]
|
||||
|
||||
## Requirement Clarity
|
||||
- [ ] CHK005 Is "structured description" defined with specific markdown or text constraints? [Clarity, Spec §SC-004]
|
||||
- [ ] CHK006 Are "recent commit history" requirements defined by count or time window? [Clarity, Spec §FR-012]
|
||||
|
||||
## Edge Case Coverage
|
||||
- [ ] CHK007 Are requirements defined for when the LLM generates hallucinated column names? [Edge Case, Gap]
|
||||
- [ ] CHK008 Are rollback requirements defined if a metadata update fails partially? [Edge Case, Gap]
|
||||
- [ ] CHK009 Are requirements defined for handling empty or null schema inputs? [Edge Case, Gap]
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
|
||||
# Checklist: Reliability & Security Requirements Quality
|
||||
|
||||
**Purpose**: Validate requirement quality for LLM integration reliability and security.
|
||||
**Feature**: `017-llm-analysis-plugin`
|
||||
**Created**: 2026-01-28
|
||||
|
||||
## Requirement Completeness
|
||||
- [ ] CHK001 Are retry strategies (count, backoff) defined for all external LLM API calls? [Completeness, Spec §FR-018]
|
||||
- [ ] CHK002 Are timeout thresholds specified for long-running validation tasks? [Completeness, Gap]
|
||||
- [ ] CHK003 Are encryption requirements defined for storing API keys at rest? [Completeness, Spec §FR-002]
|
||||
- [ ] CHK004 Are masking requirements defined for displaying API keys in the UI? [Completeness, Gap]
|
||||
- [ ] CHK005 Is the fallback behavior defined when the primary screenshot method (Headless) fails? [Completeness, Spec §FR-016]
|
||||
- [ ] CHK006 Are requirements defined for handling rate limits from LLM providers? [Completeness, Gap]
|
||||
- [ ] CHK007 Are data privacy requirements specified regarding what dashboard data (screenshots, logs) is sent to the LLM? [Completeness, Gap]
|
||||
|
||||
## Requirement Clarity
|
||||
- [ ] CHK008 Is "securely store" quantified with specific encryption standards (e.g., AES-256)? [Clarity, Spec §FR-002]
|
||||
- [ ] CHK009 Are "recent execution logs" defined by specific time window or line count? [Clarity, Spec §FR-006]
|
||||
- [ ] CHK010 Is "automatic retry logic" defined with specific backoff parameters? [Clarity, Spec §FR-018]
|
||||
|
||||
## Edge Case Coverage
|
||||
- [ ] CHK011 Are requirements defined for scenarios where the LLM provider is completely unreachable? [Edge Case, Gap]
|
||||
- [ ] CHK012 Are requirements defined for handling "token limit exceeded" errors with large logs? [Edge Case, Gap]
|
||||
- [ ] CHK013 Are requirements defined for invalid/expired API keys during task execution? [Edge Case, Gap]
|
||||
34
specs/017-llm-analysis-plugin/checklists/requirements.md
Normal file
34
specs/017-llm-analysis-plugin/checklists/requirements.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
|
||||
# Specification Quality Checklist: LLM Analysis & Documentation Plugins
|
||||
|
||||
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
|
||||
**Created**: 2026-01-28
|
||||
**Feature**: [specs/017-llm-analysis-plugin/spec.md](../spec.md)
|
||||
|
||||
## Content Quality
|
||||
|
||||
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
||||
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
|
||||
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
||||
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
|
||||
|
||||
## Requirement Completeness
|
||||
|
||||
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
||||
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
||||
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
|
||||
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
|
||||
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
|
||||
- [x] Edge cases are identified
|
||||
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
|
||||
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
||||
|
||||
## Feature Readiness
|
||||
|
||||
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
|
||||
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
|
||||
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
|
||||
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
|
||||
|
||||
## Notes
|
||||
|
||||
- Items marked incomplete require spec updates before `/speckit.clarify` or `/speckit.plan`
|
||||
24
specs/017-llm-analysis-plugin/checklists/ux-usability.md
Normal file
24
specs/017-llm-analysis-plugin/checklists/ux-usability.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
|
||||
# Checklist: UX & Usability Requirements Quality
|
||||
|
||||
**Purpose**: Validate requirement quality for user interaction and workflows.
|
||||
**Feature**: `017-llm-analysis-plugin`
|
||||
**Created**: 2026-01-28
|
||||
|
||||
## Requirement Completeness
|
||||
- [ ] CHK001 Are requirements defined for the "Validate" button state during active execution (loading/disabled)? [Completeness, Gap]
|
||||
- [ ] CHK002 Are feedback requirements defined for successful/failed connection tests in Settings? [Completeness, Gap]
|
||||
- [ ] CHK003 Are requirements specified for viewing historical validation reports? [Completeness, Spec §US1]
|
||||
- [ ] CHK004 Are requirements defined for the notification content layout (summary vs. link)? [Completeness, Spec §FR-015]
|
||||
- [ ] CHK005 Are requirements defined for the "Generate Commit" interaction flow (modal vs. inline)? [Completeness, Spec §US4]
|
||||
|
||||
## Requirement Clarity
|
||||
- [ ] CHK006 Is "visual representation" defined with resolution or format constraints? [Clarity, Spec §FR-005]
|
||||
- [ ] CHK007 Are "structured analysis" outputs defined with specific UI presentation requirements? [Clarity, Spec §SC-003]
|
||||
|
||||
## Consistency
|
||||
- [ ] CHK008 Do the new "Validate" and "Generate Docs" actions follow existing UI patterns (icons, placement)? [Consistency, Gap]
|
||||
- [ ] CHK009 Are error messages consistent with the application's existing error handling standards? [Consistency, Gap]
|
||||
|
||||
## Edge Case Coverage
|
||||
- [ ] CHK010 Are requirements defined for when a dashboard cannot be rendered (e.g., 404)? [Edge Case, Gap]
|
||||
- [ ] CHK011 Are requirements defined for when the generated commit message is empty or invalid? [Edge Case, Gap]
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user