diff --git a/.agent/workflows/audit-test.md b/.agent/workflows/audit-test.md
index 5e20c37..737a3d5 100644
--- a/.agent/workflows/audit-test.md
+++ b/.agent/workflows/audit-test.md
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ description: Audit AI-generated unit tests. Your goal is to aggressively search
 **OBJECTIVE:** Audit AI-generated unit tests. Your goal is to aggressively search for "Test Tautologies", "Logic Echoing", and "Contract Negligence". You are the final gatekeeper. If a test is meaningless, you MUST reject it.
 
 **INPUT:**
-1. SOURCE CODE (with GRACE-Poly `[DEF]` Contract: `@PRE`, `@POST`, `@TEST_DATA`).
+1. SOURCE CODE (with GRACE-Poly `[DEF]` Contract: `@PRE`, `@POST`, `@TEST_`).
 2. GENERATED TEST CODE.
 
 ### I. CRITICAL ANTI-PATTERNS (REJECT IMMEDIATELY IF FOUND):
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ description: Audit AI-generated unit tests. Your goal is to aggressively search
 
 2. **The Logic Mirror (Echoing):**
    - *Definition:* The test re-implements the exact same algorithmic logic found in the source code to calculate the `expected_result`. If the original logic is flawed, the test will falsely pass.
-   - *Rule:* Tests must assert against **static, predefined outcomes** (from `@TEST_DATA` or explicit constants), NOT dynamically calculated outcomes using the same logic as the source.
+   - *Rule:* Tests must assert against **static, predefined outcomes** (from `@TEST_` or explicit constants), NOT dynamically calculated outcomes using the same logic as the source.
 
 3. **The "Happy Path" Illusion:**
    - *Definition:* The test suite only checks successful executions but ignores the `@PRE` conditions (Negative Testing).
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ description: Audit AI-generated unit tests. Your goal is to aggressively search
 Evaluate the test code against these criteria:
 1. **Target Invocation:** Does the test actually import and call the function/component declared in the `@RELATION: VERIFIES` tag?
 2. **Contract Alignment:** Does the test suite cover 100% of the `@PRE` (negative tests) and `@POST` (assertions) conditions from the source contract?
-3. **Data Usage:** Does the test use the exact scenarios defined in `@TEST_DATA`?
+3. **Data Usage:** Does the test use the exact scenarios defined in `@TEST_`?
 4. **Mocking Sanity:** Are external dependencies mocked correctly WITHOUT mocking the system under test itself?
 
 ### III. OUTPUT FORMAT
diff --git a/.ai/PERSONA.md b/.ai/PERSONA.md
index 78cb86f..c73972f 100644
--- a/.ai/PERSONA.md
+++ b/.ai/PERSONA.md
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
 4. **ТЕСТИРОВАНИЕ И КАЧЕСТВО:**
    - Я презираю "Test Tautologies" (тесты ради покрытия, зеркалящие логику). 
    - Тесты должны быть Contract-Driven. Если есть `@PRE`, я ожидаю тест на его нарушение.
-   - Тесты обязаны использовать `@TEST_DATA` из контрактов.
+   - Тесты обязаны использовать `@TEST_` из контрактов.
 
 5. **ГЛОБАЛЬНАЯ НАВИГАЦИЯ (GraphRAG):**
    - Понимай, что мы работаем в среде Sparse Attention. 
diff --git a/.ai/shots/critical_module.py b/.ai/shots/critical_module.py
index 309f03e..490b25d 100644
--- a/.ai/shots/critical_module.py
+++ b/.ai/shots/critical_module.py
@@ -5,12 +5,75 @@
 # @LAYER: Domain (Core)
 # @RELATION: DEPENDS_ON -> [DEF:Infra:PostgresDB]
 # @RELATION: DEPENDS_ON -> [DEF:Infra:AuditLog]
+#
 # @INVARIANT: Total system balance must remain constant (Double-Entry Bookkeeping).
 # @INVARIANT: Negative transfers are strictly forbidden.
+# @INVARIANT: No partial commit must occur under failure (ACID Atomicity).
+
+# @TEST_CONTRACT: TransferInput ->
+# {
+#   required_fields: {
+#       sender_id: str,
+#       receiver_id: str,
+#       amount: Decimal
+#   },
+#   invariants: [
+#       "amount > 0",
+#       "sender_id != receiver_id"
+#   ],
+#   constraints: [
+#       "sender must exist",
+#       "receiver must exist"
+#   ]
+# }
+
+# @TEST_CONTRACT: TransferResult ->
+# {
+#   required_fields: {
+#       tx_id: str,
+#       status: str,
+#       new_balance: Decimal
+#   },
+#   invariants: [
+#       "status == COMPLETED implies balance mutation occurred"
+#   ]
+# }
+
+# @TEST_FIXTURE: sufficient_funds ->
+# {
+#   sender_balance: 500.00,
+#   receiver_balance: 100.00,
+#   amount: 100.00
+# }
+
+# @TEST_EDGE: insufficient_funds ->
+# {
+#   sender_balance: 50.00,
+#   receiver_balance: 100.00,
+#   amount: 100.00
+# }
+#
+# @TEST_EDGE: negative_amount ->
+# {
+#   sender_balance: 500.00,
+#   receiver_balance: 100.00,
+#   amount: -10.00
+# }
+#
+# @TEST_EDGE: self_transfer ->
+# {
+#   sender_id: "acc_A",
+#   receiver_id: "acc_A",
+#   amount: 10.00
+# }
+
+# @TEST_EDGE: audit_failure -> raises Exception
+# @TEST_EDGE: concurrency_conflict ->  special: concurrent_execution
+
+# @TEST_INVARIANT: total_balance_constant -> verifies: [sufficient_funds, concurrency_conflict]
+# @TEST_INVARIANT: no_partial_commit -> verifies: [audit_failure]
+# @TEST_INVARIANT: negative_transfer_forbidden -> verifies: [negative_amount]
 
-# @TEST_DATA: sufficient_funds -> {"from": "acc_A", "to": "acc_B", "amt": 100.00}
-# @TEST_DATA: insufficient_funds -> {"from": "acc_empty", "to": "acc_B", "amt": 1000.00}
-# @TEST_DATA: concurrency_lock -> {./fixtures/transactions.json#race_condition}
 
 from decimal import Decimal
 from typing import NamedTuple
diff --git a/.ai/shots/frontend_component.svelte b/.ai/shots/frontend_component.svelte
index 0f87cc1..d5d18e1 100644
--- a/.ai/shots/frontend_component.svelte
+++ b/.ai/shots/frontend_component.svelte
@@ -1,24 +1,67 @@
 <!-- [DEF:FrontendComponentShot:Component] -->
-<!-- /**
-   * @TIER: CRITICAL
-   * @SEMANTICS: Task, Button, Action, UX
-   * @PURPOSE: Action button to spawn a new task with full UX feedback cycle.
-   * @LAYER: UI (Presentation)
-   * @RELATION: CALLS -> postApi
-   * @INVARIANT: Must prevent double-submission while loading.
-   * 
-   * @TEST_DATA: idle_state -> {"isLoading": false}
-   * @TEST_DATA: loading_state -> {"isLoading": true}
-   * 
-   * @UX_STATE: Idle -> Button enabled, primary color.
-   * @UX_STATE: Loading -> Button disabled, spinner visible.
-   * @UX_STATE: Error -> Toast notification triggers.
-   * 
-   * @UX_FEEDBACK: Toast success/error.
-   * @UX_TEST: Idle -> {click: spawnTask, expected: isLoading=true}
-   * @UX_TEST: Success -> {api_resolve: 200, expected: toast.success called}
-   */
-   -->
+<!--
+/**
+ * @TIER: CRITICAL
+ * @SEMANTICS: Task, Button, Action, UX
+ * @PURPOSE: Action button to spawn a new task with full UX feedback cycle.
+ * @LAYER: UI (Presentation)
+ * @RELATION: CALLS -> postApi
+ *
+ * @INVARIANT: Must prevent double-submission while loading.
+ * @INVARIANT: Loading state must always terminate (no infinite spinner).
+ * @INVARIANT: User must receive feedback on both success and failure.
+ *
+ * @TEST_CONTRACT: ComponentState ->
+ * {
+ *   required_fields: {
+ *     isLoading: bool
+ *   },
+ *   invariants: [
+ *     "isLoading=true implies button.disabled=true",
+ *     "isLoading=true implies aria-busy=true",
+ *     "isLoading=true implies spinner visible"
+ *   ]
+ * }
+ *
+ * @TEST_CONTRACT: ApiResponse ->
+ * {
+ *   required_fields: {},
+ *   optional_fields: {
+ *     task_id: str
+ *   }
+ * }
+
+ * @TEST_FIXTURE: idle_state ->
+ * {
+ *   isLoading: false
+ * }
+ *
+ * @TEST_FIXTURE: successful_response ->
+ * {
+ *   task_id: "task_123"
+ * }
+ 
+ * @TEST_EDGE: api_failure -> raises Error("Network")
+ * @TEST_EDGE: empty_response -> {}
+ * @TEST_EDGE: rapid_double_click -> special: concurrent_click
+ * @TEST_EDGE: unresolved_promise -> special: pending_state
+ 
+ * @TEST_INVARIANT: prevent_double_submission -> verifies: [rapid_double_click]
+ * @TEST_INVARIANT: loading_state_consistency -> verifies: [idle_state, pending_state]
+ * @TEST_INVARIANT: feedback_always_emitted -> verifies: [successful_response, api_failure]
+
+ * @UX_STATE: Idle -> Button enabled, primary color, no spinner.
+ * @UX_STATE: Loading -> Button disabled, spinner visible, aria-busy=true.
+ * @UX_STATE: Success -> Toast success displayed.
+ * @UX_STATE: Error -> Toast error displayed.
+ *
+ * @UX_FEEDBACK: toast.success, toast.error
+ *
+ * @UX_TEST: Idle -> {click: spawnTask, expected: isLoading=true}
+ * @UX_TEST: Loading -> {double_click: ignored, expected: single_api_call}
+ * @UX_TEST: Success -> {api_resolve: task_id, expected: toast.success called}
+ * @UX_TEST: Error -> {api_reject: error, expected: toast.error called} 
+-->
 <script>
   import { postApi } from "$lib/api.js";
   import { t } from "$lib/i18n";
diff --git a/.ai/standards/semantics.md b/.ai/standards/semantics.md
index f80d1fc..3e91c16 100644
--- a/.ai/standards/semantics.md
+++ b/.ai/standards/semantics.md
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@
    - Tester Agent **ОБЯЗАН** использовать @TEST_CONTRACT, @TEST_FIXTURE и @TEST_EDGE при написании тестов для CRITICAL модулей.
 2. **STANDARD** (BizLogic/**Forms**):
    - Требование: Базовый контракт (@PURPOSE, @UX_STATE), Логи, @RELATION.
-   - @TEST_DATA: Рекомендуется для Complex Forms.
+   - @TEST_INVARIANT, @TEST_CONTRACT: Рекомендуется для Complex Forms.
 3. **TRIVIAL** (DTO/**Atoms**):
    - Требование: Только Якоря [DEF] и @PURPOSE.
 
diff --git a/.codex/prompts/audit-test.md b/.codex/prompts/audit-test.md
index 5e20c37..737a3d5 100644
--- a/.codex/prompts/audit-test.md
+++ b/.codex/prompts/audit-test.md
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ description: Audit AI-generated unit tests. Your goal is to aggressively search
 **OBJECTIVE:** Audit AI-generated unit tests. Your goal is to aggressively search for "Test Tautologies", "Logic Echoing", and "Contract Negligence". You are the final gatekeeper. If a test is meaningless, you MUST reject it.
 
 **INPUT:**
-1. SOURCE CODE (with GRACE-Poly `[DEF]` Contract: `@PRE`, `@POST`, `@TEST_DATA`).
+1. SOURCE CODE (with GRACE-Poly `[DEF]` Contract: `@PRE`, `@POST`, `@TEST_`).
 2. GENERATED TEST CODE.
 
 ### I. CRITICAL ANTI-PATTERNS (REJECT IMMEDIATELY IF FOUND):
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ description: Audit AI-generated unit tests. Your goal is to aggressively search
 
 2. **The Logic Mirror (Echoing):**
    - *Definition:* The test re-implements the exact same algorithmic logic found in the source code to calculate the `expected_result`. If the original logic is flawed, the test will falsely pass.
-   - *Rule:* Tests must assert against **static, predefined outcomes** (from `@TEST_DATA` or explicit constants), NOT dynamically calculated outcomes using the same logic as the source.
+   - *Rule:* Tests must assert against **static, predefined outcomes** (from `@TEST_` or explicit constants), NOT dynamically calculated outcomes using the same logic as the source.
 
 3. **The "Happy Path" Illusion:**
    - *Definition:* The test suite only checks successful executions but ignores the `@PRE` conditions (Negative Testing).
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ description: Audit AI-generated unit tests. Your goal is to aggressively search
 Evaluate the test code against these criteria:
 1. **Target Invocation:** Does the test actually import and call the function/component declared in the `@RELATION: VERIFIES` tag?
 2. **Contract Alignment:** Does the test suite cover 100% of the `@PRE` (negative tests) and `@POST` (assertions) conditions from the source contract?
-3. **Data Usage:** Does the test use the exact scenarios defined in `@TEST_DATA`?
+3. **Data Usage:** Does the test use the exact scenarios defined in `@TEST_`?
 4. **Mocking Sanity:** Are external dependencies mocked correctly WITHOUT mocking the system under test itself?
 
 ### III. OUTPUT FORMAT
diff --git a/.codex/prompts/speckit.test.md b/.codex/prompts/speckit.test.md
index 2790703..32b6d77 100644
--- a/.codex/prompts/speckit.test.md
+++ b/.codex/prompts/speckit.test.md
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ Execute full testing cycle: analyze code for testable modules, write tests with
 
 1. **NEVER delete existing tests** - Only update if they fail due to bugs in the test or implementation
 2. **NEVER duplicate tests** - Check existing tests first before creating new ones
-3. **Use TEST_DATA fixtures** - For CRITICAL tier modules, read @TEST_DATA from .specify/memory/semantics.md
+3. **Use TEST_DATA fixtures** - For CRITICAL tier modules, read @TEST_ from semantics header
 4. **Co-location required** - Write tests in `__tests__` directories relative to the code being tested
 
 ## Execution Steps
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ Determine:
 
 **From .specify/memory/semantics.md:**
 - Read @TIER annotations for modules
-- For CRITICAL modules: Read @TEST_DATA fixtures
+- For CRITICAL modules: Read @TEST_ fixtures
 
 **From existing tests:**
 - Scan `__tests__` directories for existing tests
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ Create coverage matrix:
 For each module requiring tests:
 
 1. **Check existing tests**: Scan `__tests__/` for duplicates
-2. **Read TEST_DATA**: If CRITICAL tier, read @TEST_DATA from .specify/memory/semantics.md
+2. **Read TEST_DATA**: If CRITICAL tier, read @TEST_ from semantic header
 3. **Write test**: Follow co-location strategy
    - Python: `src/module/__tests__/test_module.py`
    - Svelte: `src/lib/components/__tests__/test_component.test.js`
diff --git a/.kilocode/workflows/speckit.fix.md b/.kilocode/workflows/speckit.fix.md
index 1348772..dc1e1c5 100644
--- a/.kilocode/workflows/speckit.fix.md
+++ b/.kilocode/workflows/speckit.fix.md
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ Analyze test failure reports, identify root causes, and fix implementation issue
 
 1. **USE CODER MODE**: Always switch to `coder` mode for code fixes
 2. **SEMANTIC PROTOCOL**: Never remove semantic annotations ([DEF], @TAGS). Only update code logic.
-3. **TEST DATA**: If tests use @TEST_DATA fixtures, preserve them when fixing
+3. **TEST DATA**: If tests use @TEST_ fixtures, preserve them when fixing
 4. **NO DELETION**: Never delete existing tests or semantic annotations
 5. **REPORT FIRST**: Always write a fix report before making changes
 
diff --git a/.kilocode/workflows/speckit.test.md b/.kilocode/workflows/speckit.test.md
index 7e34598..2e319b8 100644
--- a/.kilocode/workflows/speckit.test.md
+++ b/.kilocode/workflows/speckit.test.md
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ Determine:
 
 **From .ai/standards/semantics.md:**
 - Read @TIER annotations for modules
-- For CRITICAL modules: Read @TEST_DATA fixtures
+- For CRITICAL modules: Read @TEST_ fixtures
 
 **From existing tests:**
 - Scan `__tests__` directories for existing tests
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ Create coverage matrix:
 For each module requiring tests:
 
 1. **Check existing tests**: Scan `__tests__/` for duplicates
-2. **Read TEST_DATA**: If CRITICAL tier, read @TEST_DATA from .ai/standards/semantics.md
+2. **Read TEST_DATA**: If CRITICAL tier, read @TEST_ from semantics header
 3. **Write test**: Follow co-location strategy
    - Python: `src/module/__tests__/test_module.py`
    - Svelte: `src/lib/components/__tests__/test_component.test.js`
diff --git a/semantic_protocol.md b/semantic_protocol.md
deleted file mode 100755
index 3dc1fad..0000000
--- a/semantic_protocol.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,98 +0,0 @@
-### **SYSTEM STANDARD: GRACE-Poly (UX Edition)**
-
-РОЛЬ: Архитектор Семантической Когерентности.
-ЗАДАЧА: Генерация кода (Python/Svelte).
-РЕЖИМ: Строгий. Детерминированный. Без болтовни.
-
-#### I. ЗАКОН (АКСИОМЫ)
-1. Смысл первичен. Код вторичен.
-2. Контракт (@PRE/@POST) — источник истины.
-**3. UX — это логика, а не декор. Состояния интерфейса — часть контракта.**
-4. Структура `[DEF]...[/DEF]` — нерушима.
-5. Архитектура в Header — неизменяема.
-6. Сложность фрактала ограничена: модуль < 300 строк.
-
-#### II. СИНТАКСИС (ЖЕСТКИЙ ФОРМАТ)
-ЯКОРЬ (Контейнер):
-  Начало: `# [DEF:id:Type]` (Python) | `<!-- [DEF:id:Type] -->` (Svelte)
-  Конец:  `# [/DEF:id:Type]` (Python) | `<!-- [/DEF:id:Type] -->` (Svelte) (ОБЯЗАТЕЛЬНО для аккумуляции)
-  Типы:   Module, Class, Function, Component, Store.
-
-ТЕГ (Метаданные):
-  Вид: `# @KEY: Value` (внутри DEF, до кода).
-
-ГРАФ (Связи):
-  Вид: `# @RELATION: PREDICATE -> TARGET_ID`
-  Предикаты: DEPENDS_ON, CALLS, INHERITS, IMPLEMENTS, DISPATCHES, **BINDS_TO**.
-
-#### III. СТРУКТУРА ФАЙЛА
-1. HEADER (Всегда первый):
-   [DEF:filename:Module]
-   @TIER: [CRITICAL|STANDARD|TRIVIAL] (Дефолт: STANDARD)
-   @SEMANTICS: [keywords]
-   @PURPOSE: [Главная цель]
-   @LAYER: [Domain/UI/Infra]
-   @RELATION: [Зависимости]
-   @INVARIANT: [Незыблемое правило]
-   
-2. BODY: Импорты -> Реализация.
-3. FOOTER: [/DEF:filename]
-
-#### IV. КОНТРАКТ (DBC & UX)
-Расположение: Внутри [DEF], ПЕРЕД кодом.
-Стиль Python: Комментарии `# @TAG`.
-Стиль Svelte: JSDoc `/** @tag */` внутри `<script>`.
-
-**Базовые Теги:**
-  @PURPOSE: Суть (High Entropy).
-  @PRE: Входные условия.
-  @POST: Гарантии выхода.
-  @SIDE_EFFECT: Мутации, IO.
-  
-**UX Теги (Svelte/Frontend):**
-  **@UX_STATE:** `[StateName] -> Визуальное поведение` (Idle, Loading, Error).
-  **@UX_FEEDBACK:** Реакция системы (Toast, Shake, Red Border).
-  **@UX_RECOVERY:** Механизм исправления ошибки пользователем (Retry, Clear Input).
-  
-**UX Testing Tags (для Tester Agent):**
-  **@UX_TEST:** Спецификация теста для UX состояния.
-  Формат: `@UX_TEST: [state] -> {action, expected}`
-  Пример: `@UX_TEST: Idle -> {click: toggle, expected: isExpanded=true}`
-  
-Правило: Не используй `assert` в коде, используй `if/raise` или `guards`.
-
-#### V. АДАПТАЦИЯ (TIERS)
-Определяется тегом `@TIER` в Header.
-
-1. **CRITICAL** (Core/Security/**Complex UI**):
-   - Требование: Полный контракт (включая **все @UX теги**), Граф, Инварианты, Строгие Логи.
-   - **@TEST_DATA**: Обязательные эталонные данные для тестирования. Формат:
-     ```
-     @TEST_DATA: fixture_name -> {JSON_PATH} | {INLINE_DATA}
-     ```
-     Примеры:
-     - `@TEST_DATA: valid_user -> {./fixtures/users.json#valid}`
-     - `@TEST_DATA: empty_state -> {"dashboards": [], "total": 0}`
-   - Tester Agent **ОБЯЗАН** использовать @TEST_DATA при написании тестов для CRITICAL модулей.
-2. **STANDARD** (BizLogic/**Forms**):
-   - Требование: Базовый контракт (@PURPOSE, @UX_STATE), Логи, @RELATION.
-   - @TEST_DATA: Рекомендуется для Complex Forms.
-3. **TRIVIAL** (DTO/**Atoms**):
-   - Требование: Только Якоря [DEF] и @PURPOSE.
-
-#### VI. ЛОГИРОВАНИЕ (BELIEF STATE & TASK LOGS)
-Цель: Трассировка для самокоррекции и пользовательский мониторинг.
-Python: 
-  - Системные логи: Context Manager `with belief_scope("ID"):`.
-  - Логи задач: `context.logger.info("msg", source="component")`.
-Svelte: `console.log("[ID][STATE] Msg")`.
-Состояния: Entry -> Action -> Coherence:OK / Failed -> Exit.
-Инвариант: Каждый лог задачи должен иметь атрибут `source` для фильтрации.
-
-#### VII. АЛГОРИТМ ГЕНЕРАЦИИ
-1. АНАЛИЗ. Оцени TIER, слой и UX-требования.
-2. КАРКАС. Создай `[DEF]`, Header и Контракты.
-3. РЕАЛИЗАЦИЯ. Напиши логику, удовлетворяющую Контракту (и UX-состояниям).
-4. ЗАМЫКАНИЕ. Закрой все `[/DEF]`.
-
-ЕСЛИ ошибка или противоречие -> СТОП. Выведи `[COHERENCE_CHECK_FAILED]`.
\ No newline at end of file