workflows update
This commit is contained in:
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Setup**: Run `.specify/scripts/bash/setup-plan.sh --json` from repo root and parse JSON for FEATURE_SPEC, IMPL_PLAN, SPECS_DIR, BRANCH. For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Load context**: Read FEATURE_SPEC and `.ai/standards/constitution.md`. Load IMPL_PLAN template (already copied).
|
||||
2. **Load context**: Read `.ai/ROOT.md` and `.ai/PROJECT_MAP.md` to understand the project structure and navigation. Then read required standards: `.ai/standards/constitution.md` and `.ai/standards/semantics.md`. Load IMPL_PLAN template.
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Execute plan workflow**: Follow the structure in IMPL_PLAN template to:
|
||||
- Fill Technical Context (mark unknowns as "NEEDS CLARIFICATION")
|
||||
@@ -64,16 +64,30 @@ You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
|
||||
|
||||
**Prerequisites:** `research.md` complete
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Extract entities from feature spec** → `data-model.md`:
|
||||
- Entity name, fields, relationships
|
||||
- Validation rules from requirements
|
||||
- State transitions if applicable
|
||||
0. **Validate Design against UX Reference**:
|
||||
- Check if the proposed architecture supports the latency, interactivity, and flow defined in `ux_reference.md`.
|
||||
- **Linkage**: Ensure key UI states from `ux_reference.md` map to Component Contracts (`@UX_STATE`).
|
||||
- **CRITICAL**: If the technical plan compromises the UX (e.g. "We can't do real-time validation"), you **MUST STOP** and warn the user.
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Define interface contracts** (if project has external interfaces) → `/contracts/`:
|
||||
- Identify what interfaces the project exposes to users or other systems
|
||||
- Document the contract format appropriate for the project type
|
||||
- Examples: public APIs for libraries, command schemas for CLI tools, endpoints for web services, grammars for parsers, UI contracts for applications
|
||||
- Skip if project is purely internal (build scripts, one-off tools, etc.)
|
||||
1. **Extract entities from feature spec** → `data-model.md`:
|
||||
- Entity name, fields, relationships, validation rules.
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Design & Verify Contracts (Semantic Protocol)**:
|
||||
- **Drafting**: Define `[DEF:id:Type]` Headers, Contracts, and closing `[/DEF:id:Type]` for all new modules based on `.ai/standards/semantics.md`.
|
||||
- **TIER Classification**: Explicitly assign `@TIER: [CRITICAL|STANDARD|TRIVIAL]` to each module.
|
||||
- **CRITICAL Requirements**: For all CRITICAL modules, define full `@PRE`, `@POST`, and (if UI) `@UX_STATE` contracts. **MUST** also define testing contracts: `@TEST_CONTRACT`, `@TEST_FIXTURE`, `@TEST_EDGE`, and `@TEST_INVARIANT`.
|
||||
- **Self-Review**:
|
||||
- *Completeness*: Do `@PRE`/`@POST` cover edge cases identified in Research? Are test contracts present for CRITICAL?
|
||||
- *Connectivity*: Do `@RELATION` tags form a coherent graph?
|
||||
- *Compliance*: Does syntax match `[DEF:id:Type]` exactly and is it closed with `[/DEF:id:Type]`?
|
||||
- **Output**: Write verified contracts to `contracts/modules.md`.
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Simulate Contract Usage**:
|
||||
- Trace one key user scenario through the defined contracts to ensure data flow continuity.
|
||||
- If a contract interface mismatch is found, fix it immediately.
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Generate API contracts**:
|
||||
- Output OpenAPI/GraphQL schema to `/contracts/` for backend-frontend sync.
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Agent context update**:
|
||||
- Run `.specify/scripts/bash/update-agent-context.sh agy`
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user